Who pays in Lewis case?
Sue Mello
Taxpayers may be wondering who will foot the bill for the recent
judgment against the Boothbay-Boothbay Harbor Combined School District
(CSD) in the lawsuit brought by former industrial arts teacher Fred Lewis.
Although Justice S. Kirk Studstrup granted immunity to former Police Chief
Steve Clark, he upheld the jury's July decision against the school
district and its employees. Studstrup assessed $5,000 in damages and
$45,000 in punitive damages against both former superintendent Mark Keegan
and Boothbay Region High School principal Jack Tourtillotte and $245,000
in damages to the CSD. He also assessed the defendants for court costs and
interest.
Daniel G. Lilley, Lewis' attorney, says that Lewis has filed for
$60,000 in statutory interest and costs, bringing the total assessment
against the school district and its administrators to over $400,000. It is
presently not clear whether these damages will be paid by the school
district's insurance or the towns' taxpayers.
Superintendent Eileen King said that the CSD has filed an appeal in the
case, and because of the pending litigation, she is not free to comment on
many issues. Lilley claimed that "There is nothing to appeal . . . The
school district is just postponing the inevitable." King said that the
appeal could take another year to resolve. According to Lilley, the
interest awarded to Lewis, unless overturned in the appeal, will continue
to accrue during the appeal process. Lilley said that although
pre-judgement interest rates are about three percent, post-judgement
interest rates are much higher, at about 10 percent.
King stated that the CSD has spent $2,500 in legal fees on the case to
date and that that amount was paid as a deductible. The question of
whether the monetary assessment, if upheld, will be paid by the CSD's
liability insurance or will be borne by the school district remains
unanswered. King stated that the insurer informed the CSD on February 7,
2007 that some parts of the case might not be covered. The CSD has since
filed suit against its insurer. Whether the legal costs of the appeal or
the lawsuit against the insurance company will be borne by taxpayers is
also currently unclear.
The crux of Lewis's lawsuit was that he was wrongly accused of having a
sexual relationship with a student and that actions by school
administrators forced his premature resignation. On December 14, 2001,
school administrators placed Lewis on paid administrative leave after
learning that the Boothbay Harbor Police Department was investigating
allegations against Lewis of sexual misconduct with a minor and
trespassing. On December 15, Police Chief Clark learned that the
allegations of sexual misconduct were actually against another school
employee, not Lewis. On Monday, December 17, Clark met with Tourtillotte
and Keegan and informed them of the mistake. Later that week, Keegan and
Tourtillotte met with Lewis but did not inform him of the new information
from Clark that cleared him. On December 20, 2001, Lewis resigned. Prior
to his resignation, Lewis had been a BRHS industrial arts teacher for 23
years.
Lilley stated, "This was a cover up. Instead of coming forward and
admitting their mistake, the school district kept trying to find something
against Lewis. The jury didn't find negligence in this case or
carelessness, they found that the school administrators committed acts
motivated by ill will, bad faith, or improper motive. This is a serious
finding."
King would not comment on whether the CSD or its insurers would cover
the assessments against Tourtillotte and Keegan. Lilley suggested that
most municipalities would pay for an employee's wrongdoing, but that it
will be the school district's decision. "If the CSD doesn't pick up the
tab for the individuals, we will go after the individuals," he
concluded.
Although the judge and jury have rendered their decision, for the
taxpayers of Boothbay and Boothbay Harbor, this case is far from over.
|  |
|