New School Dollars Won't Help Coastal Towns For Special Needs
Victoria Wallack
Communities with high property values -- like those along the
coast -- will get a mixed bag of property tax relief from the
governor's proposed tax reform legislation, and some will
actually lose state aid, according to education funding numbers
released on Tuesday.
Boothbay and Boothbay Harbor, now minimum receivers of state
education aid because of their high land values, will get a
$656,000 increase this year thanks to the full funding of
special needs in the governor's tax plan. Wiscasset, on the
other hand, will see an increase of $421,000 this year but then
get a cut of more than $1 million the following year, based on
increased property values.
The state aid numbers are a critical piece of the governor's
tax reform plan. Under his proposal, currently being amended and
refined by a special Joint Select Committee on Property Tax
Reform, the state will be picking up more of K-12 education
costs -- from the current 43 percent to 55 percent in four
years. The promise is that every dollar of new state aid will
translate into 90-cents of property tax relief at the local
level.
That aid, however, is not given out equally, rather it is based
on a community's ability to pay and whether enrollments are
going up or down.
The governor's plan also incorporates the new Essential Programs
and Services funding formula, which determines what school
districts should be spending to educate students so they can
pass mandated standardized tests. The bonus in that model is it
pays 100 percent of special needs costs even for high-value
towns like Boothbay, which under the old formula received
minimum subsidies.
Statewide, 45 districts out of 286 are losing state aid largely
because of declining enrollments, increased property valuations
or a combination of the two.
Based in part on those EPS figures, the tax reform committee
will decide what other tax relief options to include in its
reform bill, expected to be voted on by the Legislature by Jan.
20.
On Tuesday afternoon the committee reviewed five constitutional
amendments that would provide targeted tax relief through local
option homestead or circuit-breaker programs that cities and
towns would have to pay for, if adopted. The group also
discussed taxing working waterfront properties based on their
current use -- similar to the way forest and farmland is now
taxed -- rather than assessing them based on their value if
developed into housing.
Whatever proposals the tax committee decides to add onto or
change in the governor's plan will be decided by this week. The
group agreed to a timetable on Monday that promised the tax bill
would be hammered out by the end of its workday on Friday --
whenever that occurs.
Tax reform losers
The biggest losers in general state aid for education -- and
therefore property tax relief under the governor's plan -- will
be those communities whose values have risen the most
dramatically in recent years, and whose school enrollments are
going down. Small schools also lose out under EPS because they
can't justify administrative costs based on their enrollments.
State figures released last week show the highest valuation
increases this year were in Lincoln County, with 23 percent
growth; Sagadahoc and Knox were at 16.7 percent; York at 15.7;
Hancock at 15; and, Cumberland at 14.5.
More school districts would be on the losing end based on their
high values if it weren't for the fact they already were minimum
receivers because of their high values before the EPS numbers
were released on Tuesday.
Those districts include Bar Harbor, Blue Hill, Boothbay,
Camden, Castine, Georgetown, Mount Desert, Southwest Harbor and
Tremont. They came out ahead because rather than simply getting
minimum subsidy -- around five percent of operating costs -- as
they did before, they now get 100 percent of special needs
costs, which is substantially higher. In Booth-bay, for example,
state aid is going up from $211,326 to $867,444 because of the
special needs reimbursement.
Other communities are just now paying the price of their
increased valuations. Land values in Millbridge, for example,
have gone up 23 percent and the school district based there is
losing $816,000 in state aid next year. Orland is losing $48,692
in state aid this year and another $119,495 the year after that
because its land values have risen 35 percent and enrollment is
going down.
For those cities and towns where escalating property values are
forcing long-time owners out of their homes, constitutional
amendments are being considered to provide tax relief. Proposals
include a different property tax on primary versus secondary
homes; consideration of current-use value for property under
long-term ownership -- similar to the Maine Land Bank
legislation already rejected by the Legislature; valuation caps
on working waterfront; and, local option or locally adopted
enhanced circuit-breakers or homestead exemptions, going beyond
what is currently offered statewide.
Targeted relief
One idea that has picked up substantial support on the
committee is a circuit-breaker that goes beyond what the
governor has proposed. The governor's bill, known as LD1,
expands income eligibility to $75,000 for families and $50,000
for individuals, but keeps the maximum benefit at $1,000 per
household for now.
Committee member, Sen. Peter Mills, R-Somerset, and Co-chairman
Rep. Richard Woodbury, an independent from Yarmouth, have worked
on a plan that would raise the maximum benefit to between $2,000
and $4,000 and allow a tax break on the first $3,000 of taxes
paid for individuals and $4,000 for families. It phases out the
benefit gradually, giving those families earning $90,000 a $200
tax break.
"The circuit breaker in LD1 doesn't do enough," said Mills, who
would like to do away with the current homestead exemption --
which allows Maine homeowners to deduct from $3,000 to $7,000 of
their home's value before paying property taxes. He would like
to use the estimated $36 million the homestead exemption costs
annually to beef up circuit-breaker.
Mills also has proposed local option homesteads and
circuit-breakers, where cities and towns would be allowed to go
beyond what the state offers.
Other states offer an array of options.
The homestead exemption in Florida is $25,000 for every person,
who calls that state his permanent home. Florida also has a
local option homestead for persons 65 or older earning $20,000
or less, and allows an additional homestead exemption of up to
$25,000 in counties or municipalities that choose to adopt it.
In Texas there's a $15,000 homestead exemption for school
taxes; a $3,000 exemption for certain county taxes; and people
over 65 can qualify for an additional $10,000 exemption for
school taxes. There's also a local option homestead for all
local governing units of up to 20 percent of a home's value.
|